I can assure you Exxon knows what is there . Listen to PRE when they say each structure has 5-10 T's of NG. Or listen to the shorts who are betting against you. The SR VP of PRE does not have any motivation to over state whats in the ground. GCA is misquoted all the time. More short nonsense. All bidders are using GLJ . Not sure call WA have a CC. Listen to the taped LNG conference call with Henry Aldorf where he states IOC has 13 T's at E/A alone. GCA stated IOC with two more wells would have 8.3 T's. Had enough for two trains in the partial release of the 38 page report. Has that quantity of NG disappeared????Geez guys get real. The PPS has nothing to do with the assets, the sell down and especially has nothing to do with the deal prices IOC will receive. More sure nonsense. Stop buying calls and wait with common stock
|
Petroleum Economist
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Petroleum Economist - by jft310 - 06-04-2013, 09:24 PM
RE: Petroleum Economist - by Tree - 06-04-2013, 09:39 PM
RE: Petroleum Economist - by Petro2458 - 06-04-2013, 10:27 PM
RE: Petroleum Economist - by j4j - 06-04-2013, 10:37 PM
RE: Petroleum Economist - by CAC - 06-04-2013, 10:49 PM
RE: Petroleum Economist - by jft310 - 06-04-2013, 10:39 PM
RE: Petroleum Economist - by CAC - 06-05-2013, 02:08 AM
RE: Petroleum Economist - by ArtM72 - 06-04-2013, 11:02 PM
RE: Petroleum Economist - by jft310 - 06-04-2013, 11:05 PM
RE: Petroleum Economist - by ellerslick - 06-04-2013, 11:10 PM
RE: Petroleum Economist - by sageo - 06-04-2013, 11:15 PM
RE: Petroleum Economist - by Palm - 06-05-2013, 02:29 AM
RE: Petroleum Economist - by CAC - 06-05-2013, 02:38 AM
RE: Petroleum Economist - by admin - 06-05-2013, 02:34 AM
RE: Petroleum Economist - by Palm - 06-05-2013, 02:39 AM
RE: Petroleum Economist - by tarulestheday - 06-05-2013, 03:43 AM
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

