Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
THE DEAL
#24

'ltinvest' pid='23751' dateline='<a href="tel:1370367 Wrote:"- IOC may also get some ownership in PNG LNG. - I think JFT is right in that XOM will probably be spending another $1 billion or so on additional drilling in PRL 15, starting probably with Elk 3 and Antelope 4, and there may also be some drilling in other prospects in the PRL such as Mule Deer, a formation adjacent to E/A. - Probably 22.5% of the gas sold to XOM will be from the government, in addition to part from Pacific LNG, leaving IOC a larger portion for future deals beyond the proceeds from this deal, and much more flexibility in how it proceeds from here." Get. I'm not as clear on these details as I am on the others. Certainly sounds plausible. As for the valuation comments, It doesn't appear the market is pricing anywhere near the true value of this deal. I consider the $1-$1.20 to be quite attractive....and without having to build an LNG plant!!! As STP often points out......think of the value this first deal creates going forward! It's important to view this deal as a starting point and not a finish line. It is transformative to IOC, unlocks tremendous value and significantly derisks the stock. Tremendously accretive. 1) IOC will receive staged payments in a transaction valued at $4B to $5B. 2) IOC will have ownership in a gathering system, pipeline, and CSP plant. 3) Cash flows from CSP starting in 2015. 4) Ability to do future deals with 4.5T to 8T (TBD) of gas and liquids at E/A. 5) As Palm states, FID and booked reserves. 6) Accelerated exploration. etc... I completely agree with Petro......."$1 to $1.2 to $1.50/mcf for first train and reserves booked this year make this a perfect analog to OSH...and a double from here"

So LT, if I understand correctly the JV with XOM will cover only upstream, CSP plant, and pipeline/infrastructure needed to get the gas to where it is handed over to XOM. IOC will not have an ownership interest in the PNG LNG plant, so it won't have an interest in the value added to the gas after its sale to XOM. XOM may add its train cheaply and sell the gas at $20/mcf or whatever but IOC won't have a share of that.

IOC will have a full (58.6%) ownership in the rest of EA over and above the first 4.5tcf (plus Tri after PRE's 10%). How much that is awaits further delineation. We suspect it is at least another 4-5tcf but won't XOM have to agree there is sufficient extra for any further deals to be made, whether with XOM or with some other partner(s)? (This is where a modular plant for further deals may make a lot of  sense.) Will XOM agree to that on the basis of further delineation wells and recertification (a few months) or will they want to wait until after production firms up estimates of how much EA can produce (rather more than a few months)? Until that point, whenever it is, there will be a return to uncertain speculation about future deals, which has never been good for the pps.

Something I know nothing about is, does this kind of deal, a sale of feedstock, affect the booking to reserves of the rest of EA? XOM's FID won't, I would think (help me out here) refer to anything more than the gas it is buying. Would the rest of EA remain as resource only until a further and different deal gets to FID?

Am I understanding all this right? If so it may account for the market's hesitation about how great this deal will be.

Reply



Messages In This Thread
THE DEAL - by ltinvest - 06-04-2013, 11:39 PM
RE: THE DEAL - by Spartina - 06-04-2013, 11:44 PM
RE: THE DEAL - by jft310 - 06-04-2013, 11:49 PM
RE: THE DEAL - by ArtM72 - 06-05-2013, 12:49 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by admin - 06-04-2013, 11:59 PM
RE: THE DEAL - by Tree - 06-05-2013, 12:04 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by Palm - 06-05-2013, 12:09 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by Petro2458 - 06-05-2013, 12:16 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by johnwgrant - 06-05-2013, 12:17 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by ltinvest - 06-05-2013, 01:02 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by johnwgrant - 06-05-2013, 01:09 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by Investor1979 - 06-05-2013, 01:54 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by ltinvest - 06-05-2013, 02:04 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by Getitrt2 - 06-05-2013, 02:34 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by tarulestheday - 06-05-2013, 02:36 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by admin - 06-05-2013, 02:57 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by Hoosier1 - 06-05-2013, 03:02 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by Petro2458 - 06-05-2013, 03:12 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by Movieguy - 06-05-2013, 04:20 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by jft310 - 06-05-2013, 05:42 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by Petro2458 - 06-05-2013, 07:37 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by Palm - 06-05-2013, 08:33 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by Palm - 06-05-2013, 03:14 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by ltinvest - 06-05-2013, 03:45 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by Ass0ciatedPress - 06-05-2013, 04:25 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by jake990037 - 06-05-2013, 06:12 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by petrengr1 - 06-05-2013, 06:21 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by Getitrt2 - 06-05-2013, 06:23 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by Hoosier1 - 06-05-2013, 07:13 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by Palm - 06-05-2013, 06:30 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by ArtM72 - 06-05-2013, 06:34 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by petrengr1 - 06-05-2013, 06:42 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by ltinvest - 06-05-2013, 07:19 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by ArtM72 - 06-05-2013, 08:03 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by Getitrt2 - 06-05-2013, 07:01 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by ltinvest - 06-05-2013, 07:25 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by Petro2458 - 06-05-2013, 08:57 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by Palm - 06-05-2013, 12:21 PM
RE: THE DEAL - by ArtM72 - 06-05-2013, 12:52 PM
RE: THE DEAL - by jft310 - 06-05-2013, 09:29 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by Petro2458 - 06-05-2013, 09:47 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by jake990037 - 06-05-2013, 09:55 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by Thylacine-2 - 06-05-2013, 10:10 AM
RE: THE DEAL - by jft310 - 06-05-2013, 10:13 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)