Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM
#5

This is the reason we are down big yesterday.  Two primary reasons from the report:

1. Recertification of the resource.  Makes it sound like we don't know what is really there and therefore throws into question the value of IOC as a whole.

2. 6.5 years to begin producing LNG is a long time.

I hope this report has it completely wrong,

Good luck longs.

Reply



Messages In This Thread
Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM - by Tree - 06-22-2013, 12:54 AM
RE: Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM - by calaban48 - 06-22-2013, 01:12 AM
RE: Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM - by jft310 - 06-22-2013, 01:43 AM
RE: Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM - by ArtM72 - 06-22-2013, 05:04 AM
RE: Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM - by will2bgreat - 06-22-2013, 08:51 PM
RE: Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM - by Optionray - 06-22-2013, 09:11 PM
RE: Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM - by jft310 - 06-22-2013, 10:55 PM
RE: Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM - by will2bgreat - 06-23-2013, 04:14 AM
RE: Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM - by Palm - 06-22-2013, 11:06 PM
RE: Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM - by sydbod - 06-23-2013, 12:02 AM
RE: Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM - by jft310 - 06-23-2013, 06:08 AM
RE: Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM - by Tree - 06-27-2013, 03:07 AM
RE: Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM - by jft310 - 06-27-2013, 04:37 AM
RE: Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM - by Tree - 07-26-2013, 04:07 AM
RE: Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM - by Getitrt2 - 07-26-2013, 04:32 AM
RE: Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM - by Tree - 07-26-2013, 04:46 AM
RE: Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM - by jft310 - 07-26-2013, 05:04 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)