06-22-2013, 11:41 PM
@ jft310 & Palm,
What the 2 of you are saying can not be verified from any official documentation that I can access via the inter-net.
I did not even know about IOC existence until around 6 months ago, and there was nothing in any of the OSH or STO official releases about IOC pree 6 months ago.
I can well believe there has always been a bit of palm greasing going on in PNG with the way their political system works, and I can also believe that all the companies (not just IOC) have been impacted at one time or another by some palm greasing activity of another company. That is just normal business practice in PNG.
There is so much being said about what OSH is doing that is obviously wrong when one goes to official documents that are available to anybody on the net.
Things like my query of " With OSH acknowledging that it linked up with TOT to buy into IOC's resource" have been shown to be totally wrong.
If there is hanky panky by OSH that can be documented then it should be documented.
If there is hanky panky by OSH that can be reasonably deduced from what is going on then it should be stated that it is a deduction or suspicion.
NEVER EVER should a totally WRONG statement like " With OSH acknowledging that it linked up with TOT to buy into IOC's resource" be left unchallenged as it tries to be a statement of fact when it is not.
We have to remember that this forum may have members on it that are relying on what is posted on this forum to make purchase and selling decisions. They will not always check each statement to see if it is valid. We do them a great disservice if we present information that is totally wrong.
My apologies of coming on my high horse, but for many of us money is at stake and ACCURATE information is all that we can rely on.
regards sydbod
What the 2 of you are saying can not be verified from any official documentation that I can access via the inter-net.
I did not even know about IOC existence until around 6 months ago, and there was nothing in any of the OSH or STO official releases about IOC pree 6 months ago.
I can well believe there has always been a bit of palm greasing going on in PNG with the way their political system works, and I can also believe that all the companies (not just IOC) have been impacted at one time or another by some palm greasing activity of another company. That is just normal business practice in PNG.
There is so much being said about what OSH is doing that is obviously wrong when one goes to official documents that are available to anybody on the net.
Things like my query of " With OSH acknowledging that it linked up with TOT to buy into IOC's resource" have been shown to be totally wrong.
If there is hanky panky by OSH that can be documented then it should be documented.
If there is hanky panky by OSH that can be reasonably deduced from what is going on then it should be stated that it is a deduction or suspicion.
NEVER EVER should a totally WRONG statement like " With OSH acknowledging that it linked up with TOT to buy into IOC's resource" be left unchallenged as it tries to be a statement of fact when it is not.
We have to remember that this forum may have members on it that are relying on what is posted on this forum to make purchase and selling decisions. They will not always check each statement to see if it is valid. We do them a great disservice if we present information that is totally wrong.
My apologies of coming on my high horse, but for many of us money is at stake and ACCURATE information is all that we can rely on.
regards sydbod