Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Chinese shale gas targets are dud..
#10
Agree but NG/LNG is the bridge fuel at least through 2030 IMHO. Solar has the clear advantage over wind and until some "clean" way to produce and eventually dispose of spent batteries for storage is devised, nations would be wise not to follow Germany's lead. Classic example of an overreaction to a perceived problem. Until the issues are resolved solar etc should not become the base generation source. Germany is risking loss of industry which cannot be subject to fluctuating base generation and possible brownouts due to lack of wind or cloudy days. And asking fossil fueled generation facilities to be ready turn flip switches on and off AND operate at losses while you experiment with new base generation methods is irresponsible.

Slow is the way to go with this; unless government's ultimate plan is to own all base generation sources and can "afford" to absorb these losses.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Chinese shale gas targets are dud.. - by admin - 07-02-2013, 05:46 AM
RE: Chinese shale gas targets are dud.. - by Palm - 07-02-2013, 07:26 AM
RE: Chinese shale gas targets are dud.. - by Palm - 07-02-2013, 08:53 AM
RE: Chinese shale gas targets are dud.. - by Palm - 07-02-2013, 01:02 PM
RE: Chinese shale gas targets are dud.. - by Palm - 07-02-2013, 01:22 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)