Stavros, I appreciate what you are saying, but is it really that significant to the posts?
Apologies if I am pedantic here but:
Resourcearb posted " Oil Search also wrote on slide 25, “Potential third party gas could result in further LNG expansion”, obviously referring to gas from InterOil’s PRL 15. " No one has any issue with that factual and informative statement.
Then it is continued with " Recall that InterOil’s stock tanked .... Well, that certainly is not the case. " . This added absolutely NO new information to the point he was making and at the same time was wrong.
It was just an unjustified bitch about the Citi analysis. This sort of thing is happening very often by some members and honestly, I don't understand the need for it. It is not important how people interpreted and then used that report in this particular thread, so why the need to include information from it? Can't we be above this sort of thing?
I do have shares in OSH, Santos, IOC and Woodside, so I try to make sure anything that I post dealing with any one of these shares, or even companies that I do not own shares in, is factual and not colored by my pregedies.