07-19-2013, 05:31 AM
'kerekesc' pid='25866' datel Wrote:
'sageo' pid='25860' datel Wrote:
'jft310' pid='25857' datel Wrote:Let's let Pet tell us again that the scales that IOC used on some of its slides were left off or distorted sometimes. IOC has more assets then many think and feared they would get bought out cheap before proving them out and monetizing them. Nada but smart good business for long term investors.This is the monetization process right here and right now. Multiple deals for its assets. Exxon is but deal one.jft- Like I told Tree,"good thinking" ! You guys have really got your"thinking caps" on in the right direction !! " Exxon is but deal one". Go get 'em,man ! Yeah for our team.
No, this cann't be true. Peter, the PNG Geologist, "clearly" stated that this was a dataroom below international standards!
Just imagine........if IOC's data room wasn't so inadequate then maybe IOC could have received more than a paltry minimum of 6 bids from SMs, IOCs and NOCs and maybe we wouldn't be saddled in exclusive negotiations to the highest bidder and most profitable public company in the world that needs IOC's gas for PNG LNG expansion. Oh what could have been.....hgis....