Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 train or 2 trains for IOC gas to PNG LNG.
#9

'jft310' pid='26069' datel Wrote:Total story today states they totally disagree with the OSH propaganda pieces above, "Although the volumes at Flinders and Hagana are likely to be relatively modest, the company has been sufficiently encouraged to take up a further well option, and will drill the Kidukidu prospect once Hagana-1 is completed," Oil Search said in its statement. Quote and end quote from OSH

I do not understand.

What one do you have issue with.

A) Although the volumes at Flinders and Hagana are likely to be relatively modest

Flinders 1 : 5-10 metre gas column

Hagana 1 : "Shortly after the end of the
quarter, preliminary interpretation of logging data recently acquired over the lower zone of the
Hagana well, in the secondary Pliocene objective, indicates the presence of a nine metre gas
column."

I would call that  "relatively modest" It is not medium sized or large, that is for sure.

B)take up a further well option, and will drill the Kidukidu prospect once Hagana-1 is completed

Why do you think they would not drill this prospect when it is the other side of  the  "Pasca " discovery compared to Flinders and Hagana?

Where does the Total piece say it disagrees ?

Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: 1 train or 2 trains for IOC gas to PNG LNG. - by sydbod - 07-24-2013, 12:45 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)