Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
OSH deal with XOM on PNG LNG
#7
While technically you're right, I'm not convinced of the relevance, sydbod. These infrastructure and common facilities costs are largely fixed and sunk, hence they shouldn't be relevant in any future decisions (insofar as they are sunk, needless to say) unless they retroactively apply some formula for sharing these costs
Reply



Messages In This Thread
OSH deal with XOM on PNG LNG - by bam - 07-24-2013, 02:39 AM
RE: OSH deal with XOM on PNG LNG - by admin - 07-24-2013, 02:48 AM
RE: OSH deal with XOM on PNG LNG - by sydbod - 07-24-2013, 02:59 AM
RE: OSH deal with XOM on PNG LNG - by sydbod - 07-24-2013, 02:55 AM
RE: OSH deal with XOM on PNG LNG - by Palm - 07-24-2013, 02:59 AM
RE: OSH deal with XOM on PNG LNG - by sydbod - 07-24-2013, 03:05 AM
RE: OSH deal with XOM on PNG LNG - by admin - 07-24-2013, 03:10 AM
RE: OSH deal with XOM on PNG LNG - by Palm - 07-24-2013, 03:11 AM
RE: OSH deal with XOM on PNG LNG - by sydbod - 07-24-2013, 09:32 AM
RE: OSH deal with XOM on PNG LNG - by sydbod - 07-24-2013, 09:19 AM
RE: OSH deal with XOM on PNG LNG - by jft310 - 07-24-2013, 09:51 AM
RE: OSH deal with XOM on PNG LNG - by sydbod - 07-24-2013, 10:01 AM
RE: OSH deal with XOM on PNG LNG - by kommonsents - 07-24-2013, 01:37 PM
RE: OSH deal with XOM on PNG LNG - by ArtM72 - 07-24-2013, 09:25 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)