While technically you're right, I'm not convinced of the relevance, sydbod. These infrastructure and common facilities costs are largely fixed and sunk, hence they shouldn't be relevant in any future decisions (insofar as they are sunk, needless to say) unless they retroactively apply some formula for sharing these costs
|
OSH deal with XOM on PNG LNG
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
OSH deal with XOM on PNG LNG - by bam - 07-24-2013, 02:39 AM
RE: OSH deal with XOM on PNG LNG - by admin - 07-24-2013, 02:48 AM
RE: OSH deal with XOM on PNG LNG - by sydbod - 07-24-2013, 02:59 AM
RE: OSH deal with XOM on PNG LNG - by sydbod - 07-24-2013, 02:55 AM
RE: OSH deal with XOM on PNG LNG - by Palm - 07-24-2013, 02:59 AM
RE: OSH deal with XOM on PNG LNG - by sydbod - 07-24-2013, 03:05 AM
RE: OSH deal with XOM on PNG LNG - by admin - 07-24-2013, 03:10 AM
RE: OSH deal with XOM on PNG LNG - by Palm - 07-24-2013, 03:11 AM
RE: OSH deal with XOM on PNG LNG - by sydbod - 07-24-2013, 09:32 AM
RE: OSH deal with XOM on PNG LNG - by sydbod - 07-24-2013, 09:19 AM
RE: OSH deal with XOM on PNG LNG - by jft310 - 07-24-2013, 09:51 AM
RE: OSH deal with XOM on PNG LNG - by sydbod - 07-24-2013, 10:01 AM
RE: OSH deal with XOM on PNG LNG - by kommonsents - 07-24-2013, 01:37 PM
RE: OSH deal with XOM on PNG LNG - by ArtM72 - 07-24-2013, 09:25 PM
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

