Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM
#16

'Getitrt2' pid='26222' datel Wrote:If the latter is true, which I believe it is, why would the former apply?

XOM as operator is seeking IOC gas for that expansion of behalf of project partners which have the right to cough up $ and join in expansion or minimally accept a tolling fee.  Same would hold true for P'nyang gas as it is not in PNG project agreement and we see that XOM currently does not seek that gas for the project.   Partners have no veto power they accept a larger role in project or not.

Reply



Messages In This Thread
Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM - by Tree - 06-22-2013, 12:54 AM
RE: Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM - by calaban48 - 06-22-2013, 01:12 AM
RE: Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM - by jft310 - 06-22-2013, 01:43 AM
RE: Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM - by ArtM72 - 06-22-2013, 05:04 AM
RE: Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM - by will2bgreat - 06-22-2013, 08:51 PM
RE: Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM - by Optionray - 06-22-2013, 09:11 PM
RE: Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM - by jft310 - 06-22-2013, 10:55 PM
RE: Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM - by will2bgreat - 06-23-2013, 04:14 AM
RE: Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM - by Palm - 06-22-2013, 11:06 PM
RE: Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM - by sydbod - 06-23-2013, 12:02 AM
RE: Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM - by jft310 - 06-23-2013, 06:08 AM
RE: Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM - by Tree - 06-27-2013, 03:07 AM
RE: Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM - by jft310 - 06-27-2013, 04:37 AM
RE: Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM - by Tree - 07-26-2013, 04:07 AM
RE: Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM - by Getitrt2 - 07-26-2013, 04:32 AM
RE: Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM - by Tree - 07-26-2013, 04:46 AM
RE: Wood MacKenzie on IOC/XOM - by jft310 - 07-26-2013, 05:04 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)