Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Economist on Aussie LNG
#4

'admin' pid='26229' datel Wrote:["A recent survey of 53 countries found that Australian oil and gas workers earned an average of $163,600 a year, almost double the global average. But the energy groups behind the three big projects to convert coal-seam gas to LNG have made things harder for themselves. They are building the plants side-by-side at Gladstone on Queensland’s coast, yet they have wasted perhaps billions of dollars by failing to share facilities."] Sharing facilities, hmm, now there's an idea.. Smile

This brings us back to PetEng list of what engineers would be looking at regarding sites and facilites in PRL 15.

XOM & IOC coordination on the ground down to the door mat.

A future extension of sorts is the combined seismic line that Oil Search and InterOil have planned for Tri.

Best to bring a complete structure into focus than just half.

<img src=" border="0" class="smilie" src="images/smilies/cool.gif" />

Reply



Messages In This Thread
The Economist on Aussie LNG - by admin - 07-26-2013, 05:11 AM
RE: The Economist on Aussie LNG - by admin - 07-26-2013, 05:17 AM
RE: The Economist on Aussie LNG - by Tusker - 07-26-2013, 05:39 AM
RE: The Economist on Aussie LNG - by admin - 07-26-2013, 05:21 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)