Thread Rating:
  • 4 Vote(s) - 2 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Article deleted from Upstreamonline – a confirmation of Shell’s plans to acquire IOC?
#7

THis deal changes Interoil forever. Do it right is the mantra. Post deal IOC has monetized NG and condensates and LNG participation and a pile of cash after all the infrastructure builds and the PNGLNG buy in. Sounds sweet to me...Not an option play for all.

'Ass0ciatedPress' pid='26767' dateline='<a href="tel:1375969 Wrote:

How long does it take to finalize a deal? Do we need more efficient lawyers? I just don't feel a sense of urgency with this company. Idle rigs since January, seeking extensions to licenses set to expire. The time is now to monetize its assets not later. The US and Canada continue to push forward with their own LNG projects and continue to get approval. A third US LNG export project was approved yesterday.  All of this has been extremely and unbelievably frustrating.

Does anyone see any sense of urgency?

'jft310' pid='26764' dateline='<a href="tel:1375968 Wrote:

'Resourcearb' pid='26759' dateline='<a href="tel:1375963 Wrote:

Additional evidence may have just emerged relating to the Shell/InterOil conspiracy theory.  Subsequent to the publication two days ago of my Seeking Alpha article titled “InterOil: The Stars Are Aligned For A Takeover Battle To Ensue In The Coming Weeks”, Upstreamonline seems to have removed its August 2 article titled “ExxonMobil and InterOil locked in PNG talks”, which was referenced in my article and stated that “Sources said Shell is sore at missing the opportunity, and is waiting in the wings if the ExxonMobil-InterOil talks falter”.

If you click on the link copied on the following post (http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/showthread.php?tid=4309), you’ll notice the following message, “We can't find the page you are looking for”.  Maybe the deletion is meaningless or happened by mistake, but in several years of reading Upstreamonline, I don’t recall a single article having been removed from the site.  Did Shell contact Upstreamonline or Russell Searancke Wellington and request that the article be removed?  If so, is this indicative of the veracity of the theory that Shell is in fact preparing to bid for InterOil?

In my opinion the article was deleted because it was bogus. There is no lock with Exxon over anything. the lawyers. Are finalizing the deal. It's 100 percent we get an Exxon deal. As  to Shell could.they do a deal at Gulf well sure. Shell is cheap drops out when prices rise.Refer to Cove they dropped when the price rose. I would be surprised to see Shell get a deal in Gulf and do   Not expect them to buy IOC . I do expect Exxon to buy all do iOC someday.Not soon.

Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: irmation of Shell’s plans to acquire IOC? - by jft310 - 08-08-2013, 11:44 PM
of Shell’s plans to acquire IOC? - by jft310 - 08-09-2013, 12:24 AM
RE: of Shell’s plans to acquire IOC? - by CAC - 08-09-2013, 12:40 AM
Known vs Unknown - by Ass0ciatedPress - 08-09-2013, 01:26 AM
RE: Known vs Unknown - by kommonsents - 08-09-2013, 02:40 AM
RE: Article deleted... - by Hoosier1 - 08-09-2013, 07:59 AM
RE: Article deleted... - by CAC - 08-09-2013, 08:09 AM
RE: Article deleted... - by ebster123 - 08-09-2013, 10:16 AM
It's baaaaack! - by Tree - 08-09-2013, 12:21 PM
RE: It's baaaaack! - by petrengr1 - 08-09-2013, 12:33 PM
RE: It's baaaaack! - by petrengr1 - 08-09-2013, 12:35 PM
RE: It's baaaaack! - by Tree - 08-09-2013, 12:48 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)