Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Exclusivity
#7

'Movieguy' pid='27637' datel Wrote:I do not believe IOC should let a great deal stand in the way of a very good deal. The company has NEVER made a deal of this type, despite having talked about it for years. It has had every long, including the big boys, expecting a deal for months and not achieving it. As for Hession, we know his resume, which is excellent, but little else. We really don't know his abilities or his quirks. He might be deftly moving the negotiations to a quick agreement with IOC coming out better than expected, or he might be on an ego trip to show how important he is. We just don't know. I say accept a good deal that positions the company in vastly better shape than it has ever been in before and which validates the company in everyone's eyes. Then keep exploring, drilling, partnering and monetizing. This first deal is the stepping stone, admittedly a huge one, but not the end goal. It is just the first deal of many beneficial ones to come.

MG,  Who believes they should?  Answer:  no one.  Why imply this is reality?

I do not believe IOC should let a great deal stand in the way of a very good deal.

Reply



Messages In This Thread
Exclusivity - by Tree - 08-20-2013, 10:44 PM
RE: Exclusivity - by Bevo - 08-20-2013, 10:50 PM
RE: Exclusivity - by TomCrooz - 08-20-2013, 11:28 PM
RE: Exclusivity - by Tree - 08-20-2013, 11:35 PM
RE: Exclusivity - by Palm - 08-21-2013, 12:24 AM
RE: Exclusivity - by jft310 - 08-21-2013, 11:22 AM
RE: Exclusivity - by cybersssss - 08-20-2013, 11:39 PM
RE: Exclusivity - by Movieguy - 08-20-2013, 11:50 PM
RE: Exclusivity - by Tree - 08-21-2013, 12:03 AM
RE: Exclusivity - by Movieguy - 08-21-2013, 12:18 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)