'Hoosier1' pid='28165' dateline='<a href="tel:1377812 Wrote:
'admin' pid='28142' dateline='<a href="tel:1377800 Wrote:
'Hoosier1' pid='28135' dateline='<a href="tel:1377799 Wrote:Did he write anything that was incorrect?... It's all in how you look at things. Time matters!That's a fairly stupid question, Hoosier. If you really think that just because no deal has been done, no deal will be done, then go ahead an point out any other 9T+ conventional resource which isn't monetized . If you really think Merril Lynch is renowned for their LNG plant capacity, if you really think IOC was ready to do a deal in 2006 when they had just one discovery well, if you really ignore independent resource evaluations or reasons why deals have not been consumated, etc. etc. then I'm sort of starting to wonder what you are doing here because it isn't hard with a minimal of DD, much of which you can find here, to see this article for what it is.
Well Admin... I am not as smart as you are, so let me apologize for the stupid question...
I have held your past posts, administration, and fairly well tempered demeanor in high regard... but I believe you have your head stuck to far up to see anything but what you want.
I did not imply anything that you stated... It was simple in that what he wrote was not incorrect... irrelevant to whether or not it was complete... and that it is then how you choose to look at it.... or don't you get it.
CAC has clearly conveyed it... and as Palm states and as I have stated ...It's time to get it done.... and time matters.
I guess I'll respond in kind... I think your response is stupid!
Industry standard is 4-6 months for a deal like this . O' Neil stated in 30-60 days we will know more!What date starts the process that clock ?Is it May 24th? Logic says earlier than that.When?Exxon states wants to close the deal. Argues for now through end of Sept as a guess for a deal announcement. Exxon surely wants these assets on the books by year end which requires a closing post deal announcement sooooooooon!