Thread Rating:
  • 4 Vote(s) - 2 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
$135 by Jan 18th
#6
Morgan Stanley stated what the next argument will be:
"A monetizing transaction would mark a transformation of the IOC story and should decisively rule on key debates surrounding a controversial story, driving a re-rating of IOC shares. Over the last 7+ years, the Street debate on IOC has focused on: (1) the credibility of IOC’s PNG resource; (2) the ability of IOC’s chosen partner(s) to execute on LNG monetization; (3) whether the PNG government would determine IOC violated its licenses and take IOC’s upstream assets; (4) ability of IOC to complete an upstream sell-down, a process that had begun an earlier iteration in 2009; and (5) how to value IOC’s “stranded gas” assets. Following a deal, we believe the key investor debate would switch to valuation. The debates will normalize."
So that's what we should expect, but it's a much less defendable "debate"; a deal takes the major unknowns and air out of the hard-core short arguments and they know it. After deals IOC will be looked at more like most stocks; is the pps getting ahead of valuation. Much simpler and more logical to deal with.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
$135 by Jan 18th - by Optionray - 11-17-2013, 10:47 PM
RE: $135 by Jan 18th - by smeltman - 11-18-2013, 03:28 AM
RE: $135 by Jan 18th - by Putncalls - 11-18-2013, 08:12 AM
RE: $135 by Jan 18th - by Optionray - 11-18-2013, 08:21 AM
RE: $135 by Jan 18th - by geologydude - 11-18-2013, 10:46 AM
RE: $135 by Jan 18th - by Palm - 11-18-2013, 11:07 AM
RE: $135 by Jan 18th - by will2bgreat - 11-18-2013, 03:18 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)