Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Naked short selling exposure
#3
I can see why retailers would want to commit to naked short selling, working through institutions. I can also see why institutions would be tempted to do the same, betting against different client groups, especially retailers. But what I fail to understand, is how the stock exchange cannot have checks and balances to differentiate between a normal short transaction and the naked version. I imagine that, without such differentiation, regulatory authorities can not enforce the law against such plague.

Or am I missing something?
Reply



Messages In This Thread
[No subject] - by ValueSleuth - 05-17-2012, 11:04 PM
RE: - by bertl05 - 11-30-2012, 09:00 AM
RE: - by Tusker - 12-02-2012, 02:19 PM
RE: Naked short selling exposure - by trans - 12-02-2012, 11:44 PM
[No subject] - by admin - 05-17-2012, 11:20 PM
[No subject] - by Petrovale - 05-17-2012, 11:55 PM
[No subject] - by ebster123 - 05-18-2012, 12:38 AM
[No subject] - by admin - 05-18-2012, 12:55 AM
[No subject] - by Putncalls - 05-18-2012, 01:27 AM
[No subject] - by admin - 05-18-2012, 01:48 AM
[No subject] - by Palm - 05-18-2012, 02:08 AM
[No subject] - by strategyguy536 - 05-18-2012, 02:37 AM
[No subject] - by Palm - 05-18-2012, 03:37 AM
[No subject] - by admin - 05-18-2012, 03:55 AM
[No subject] - by Palm - 05-18-2012, 04:26 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)