'Libtardius Maximus' pid='35254' datel Wrote:While many here await a daunting SA article that will vilify the deal with TOT that features the words of many of the posters here that would be so easy to write even Adam Gefvert (Mr. Dryhole Blowback) could write it.
So let's give shorts something to write about by posting concerns that none of us here know anything about. Who has the IPI agreement? Who has read it? Pavel at RJ has and states 248M is their claim, but what does he know?
Here are some underlying facts to consider while this negative typhoon swirls about awaiting the next short attack. One thing I will always admire about shorts that is worth a compliment. They control the narrative on the stock through use of the above characters...
Shorts interest is higher than the last report, they didn't cover here in the recent swoon, but hey, let's all bow to them, the all knowing that they are and continue to feed them concerns. But they are smarter than we are?
Thanks, Lib, excellent post, containing powerful arguments for shutting down SHU or taking it private, much like IOC. We have homework to do, but should better do it some place else. Also, JFT's replies to the SA article, unfortunately, do more harm than good. Should stop this, regardless his (remaining) clients, who may or may not choose to put up with it. SHU must not prostitute itself to these purposes. Between developing and fine tuning short talking points, no use fostering panaceas for short slaying, dicking with shares and dividends. Enough of this BS, it will only provide shorts more fodder. IOC must get its act together, close the deals and start drilling, FFS.