'Petrovale' pid='35276' datel Wrote:STP, this "guy" is going to take you and your pig headed academic info sharing to the shed and screw your $110 and $87 targets 10 times over, all along the short targets. And so will JFT's dicking of dividends, stock splits and other pumperisms. Hence my suggestion to take the IOC public forum offline, so we can start doing some serious homework. Now, if you don't understand the above, you're either extremely naive or addicted to the penny-per-hit counts on your website. Who else would care about your damn hits? Most people care more about IOC's performance, short - medium - long term. I trust this clarifies what I was trying to say earlier on.
In that case I am naïve as I'm not following you here.
I made a very basic calculation in an SA article, that is, in the full public eye so I don't see what should be taken private and why.
Keubiko run ranshot over the article, exploiting a typo in the text that was completely immaterial, arguing I was off by a factor more than two times
Then he produces a calculation of his own in his own article and, based on the same P50 GLJ number, ends up only slightly below my figure.
Apparently I wasn't off by a factor more than 2x.. It was hardly off by anything, if you compare it to his own calculation..
That's all.
I don't know what your rant against me is supposed to achieve, or even where it comes from, but I would like to see how you react when they rape your article, and very much intentionally so, and then refuse to budge and keep on obfuscating the fact.
With his own calculation that's now plain for all to see, that guy is not to be trusted. He doesn't mind running circles around SA collegues. Yes, we already knew that, but sometimes it's actually useful to be able to demonstrate that beyond any reasonable doubt.