Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Morgan Stanley this AM
#15
I think this comment is what it is; a reflection of what management feels is a POSSIBILITY based on the extensive data and combined knowledge and experience. They have reason to believe that there's something substantial there and it COULD be in communication with Ant. For this reason they were able to have the clause included in the SPA that IF there is the defined communication, there is a higher reward. If not, we get $100 million for every T above 1T, which is still unheard of; being paid for undiscovered resources. They have not stated what % chance they feel there is, so since this is exploration we should assign a low probability to it, but not say we know more than them and there is a 0% chance. I believe that is what Tusker is eluding to; the stage is being set for this "drama". Is there anything there? If so, is it in communication with Ant? If so, it could get us a nicer payday.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Morgan Stanley this AM - by jdeo1969 - 01-14-2014, 12:04 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by jft310 - 01-14-2014, 12:13 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by TxPm - 01-14-2014, 12:22 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by arthurbell - 01-14-2014, 12:31 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by jdeo1969 - 01-14-2014, 12:26 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by jft310 - 01-14-2014, 12:31 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by ltinvest - 01-14-2014, 12:40 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by jdeo1969 - 01-14-2014, 12:43 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by ltinvest - 01-14-2014, 01:15 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by jft310 - 01-14-2014, 01:28 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by Thylacine-2 - 01-15-2014, 12:42 PM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by Tusker - 01-15-2014, 02:25 PM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by jdeo1969 - 01-15-2014, 10:07 PM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by jft310 - 01-15-2014, 11:22 PM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by Palm - 01-16-2014, 12:24 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by Thylacine-2 - 01-16-2014, 12:49 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by petrengr1 - 01-16-2014, 03:07 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by sageo - 01-16-2014, 04:47 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by jdeo1969 - 01-16-2014, 12:55 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by Palm - 01-16-2014, 02:07 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by jdeo1969 - 01-16-2014, 02:41 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by Palm - 01-16-2014, 03:00 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by Thylacine-2 - 01-16-2014, 03:50 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by jdeo1969 - 01-16-2014, 06:00 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by petrengr1 - 01-16-2014, 06:23 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by jft310 - 01-16-2014, 06:29 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by sageo - 01-16-2014, 06:45 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by petrengr1 - 01-16-2014, 12:41 PM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by sageo - 01-17-2014, 01:17 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by petrengr1 - 01-17-2014, 01:35 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by Palm - 01-16-2014, 02:35 PM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by Getitrt2 - 01-17-2014, 01:23 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by Palm - 01-17-2014, 01:47 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by petrengr1 - 01-17-2014, 02:24 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by sageo - 01-17-2014, 03:16 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by Getitrt2 - 01-17-2014, 01:48 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by Palm - 01-17-2014, 02:30 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by Thylacine-2 - 01-17-2014, 02:56 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by petrengr1 - 01-17-2014, 03:09 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by Getitrt2 - 01-17-2014, 03:45 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by petrengr1 - 01-17-2014, 05:28 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by petrengr1 - 01-17-2014, 05:32 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by petrengr1 - 01-17-2014, 05:39 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by Thylacine-2 - 01-17-2014, 12:38 PM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by Palm - 01-17-2014, 05:42 AM
RE: Morgan Stanley this AM - by petrengr1 - 01-17-2014, 05:53 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)