01-17-2014, 02:24 AM
'Palm' pid='36225' datel Wrote:Pet, understood and that COULD be quite significant as you say. Possibly why Dave Holland and others have been so optimistic on what PRL 15 could hold, and obviously would be a case for GCA and GLJ to incease estimates. Also obviously why Hession asked for the "pressure communication" clause in the SPA. Is there any way for you to give a conservative range of what just an "expanded" Ant T-count would be (no assumptions as to Ant Deep) using the limestone assumptions you mention?
Since this is just wild speculation and with no numbers on the map I think I should not get into the guessing of additional possible reserves nuimber. I would say, if the extension exists, the thickness would probably be relatively thin compared to the main part of the field but, since we are talking about the top of the limestone, it might contain some of the better porosity. The dolomite and high porosity limestone was at the top in the main part of the field.

