01-29-2014, 08:14 AM
'sageo' pid='36678' dateline='<a href="tel:1390932 Wrote:
'ebster123' pid='36673' dateline='<a href="tel:1390929 Wrote:Getit, I believe what some take issue with is that IOC needs to learn for past experiences. The market does not like uncertainty, this is fresh meat for shorts regarding IOC. If there is any chance an expected timeline can not be met then IOC should not set or give a timeline. There was a timeline for IPI. If not met is causes potential uncertainty which is prey to shorts. We have seen this way too many times.'ebster" -(T) - Good day to you,sir. Speaking of timelines for IPI resolution, MS on the"other board" has some thoughtful comments on this situation. IMHO also, the pps is speaking"volumes" at this moment in time. Good luck my friend.
I don't know MS and over the years he has seemed to be a whiner. However, he is right on this one. I bet CC is squeezing IOC for as much as he can. This is a negotiation and the floor of the negotiation has been set by IOC and one if the analysts (I believe 200-600 million but don't hold me to that). If CC is smart he will push for two to there times that if it is modestly worth 6 billion then the IPI % is worth 1.5 billion right. If it were me I would not sell out cheap either...WHO WOULD???