|
IPI cannot wag this deal
|
|
02-15-2014, 03:36 AM
It should be clear that IPI only has an indirect participation. This means that IOC is able to sell a part of the unburdened participaton to Total without the consent of IPI. When the the production joint venture start producing, they can start consuming with the unburdened participations. This will bring IOC in a better negotiation position.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
IPI cannot wag this deal - by Tree - 02-14-2014, 12:38 PM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by ebster123 - 02-14-2014, 12:53 PM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by SamAdams - 02-14-2014, 12:57 PM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by Tree - 02-14-2014, 01:11 PM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by cybersssss - 02-14-2014, 01:21 PM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by ebster123 - 02-14-2014, 01:27 PM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by Tree - 02-15-2014, 12:34 AM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by SamAdams - 02-14-2014, 01:30 PM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by efi426hemi - 02-14-2014, 04:44 PM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by SamAdams - 02-14-2014, 05:24 PM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by jft310 - 02-15-2014, 01:02 AM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by Palm - 02-15-2014, 01:09 AM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by jft310 - 02-15-2014, 01:33 AM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by Relker - 02-15-2014, 03:36 AM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by Stavros - 02-17-2014, 09:33 AM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by jft310 - 02-17-2014, 10:26 AM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by ebster123 - 02-17-2014, 11:13 AM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by Relker - 02-17-2014, 07:41 PM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by jft310 - 02-17-2014, 10:19 PM
|
