Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
IPI cannot wag this deal
#15
I heard that PNG government interprets the Oil and Gas Act to say that an indirect participation is not allowed in a project and therefore they will remove IPI and Pacific LNG if they refuse to make a deal themselves. If this is true then maybe JFT is correct that IPI could go to zero.
Drivel Maven with Personality
Reply



Messages In This Thread
IPI cannot wag this deal - by Tree - 02-14-2014, 12:38 PM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by ebster123 - 02-14-2014, 12:53 PM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by SamAdams - 02-14-2014, 12:57 PM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by Tree - 02-14-2014, 01:11 PM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by cybersssss - 02-14-2014, 01:21 PM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by ebster123 - 02-14-2014, 01:27 PM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by Tree - 02-15-2014, 12:34 AM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by SamAdams - 02-14-2014, 01:30 PM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by efi426hemi - 02-14-2014, 04:44 PM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by SamAdams - 02-14-2014, 05:24 PM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by jft310 - 02-15-2014, 01:02 AM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by Palm - 02-15-2014, 01:09 AM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by jft310 - 02-15-2014, 01:33 AM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by Relker - 02-15-2014, 03:36 AM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by Stavros - 02-17-2014, 09:33 AM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by jft310 - 02-17-2014, 10:26 AM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by ebster123 - 02-17-2014, 11:13 AM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by Relker - 02-17-2014, 07:41 PM
RE: IPI cannot wag this deal - by jft310 - 02-17-2014, 10:19 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)