06-21-2012, 07:58 AM
So, everything positive, except when it comes to IOC. China is mentioned as having huge demand, Shell is mentioned as "the Anglo-Dutch hydrocarbon giant", Exxon only as being "US-based". OSH is touted as having found such great finds (even though much of what it has was purchased from Chevron when they went to Australia to focus on their LNG project) and poor lowly IOC is mentioned only as the problem child. Nothing about the size of its finds or the current SD process; only that they are at risk of being booted.
The "campaign" being wagered here is hardly about Duma and his value to the future of PNG or his ability tolead PNG. He is stated as representing "Port Moresby"He must be very powerful and respected.
So, if I may borrow a slogan from our VS, "connect the dots". From top to bottom; China, Shell, Duma, OSH. I wonder what Hillary was talking about when she visited PNG and said that if the US des not help support PNG, China will come in and ........ What was that?
The "campaign" being wagered here is hardly about Duma and his value to the future of PNG or his ability tolead PNG. He is stated as representing "Port Moresby"He must be very powerful and respected.
So, if I may borrow a slogan from our VS, "connect the dots". From top to bottom; China, Shell, Duma, OSH. I wonder what Hillary was talking about when she visited PNG and said that if the US des not help support PNG, China will come in and ........ What was that?