|
MS on IOC
|
05-20-2014, 12:44 AM
Well, we had a poster here citing several industry publications testifying to that 10% range, so it can't have come as too much of a surprise. Chances are pretty good that we'll hit something in those three prospects being drilled, and since these are all potentially large structures, this could still move the needle in a rather material way..
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
RE: MS on IOC - by johnwgrant - 05-20-2014, 12:37 AM
RE: MS on IOC - by Getitrt2 - 05-20-2014, 01:12 AM
RE: MS on IOC - by sageo - 05-20-2014, 01:22 AM
RE: MS on IOC - by admin - 05-20-2014, 12:44 AM
RE: MS on IOC - by Thylacine-2 - 05-20-2014, 01:36 AM
RE: MS on IOC - by sageo - 05-20-2014, 03:11 AM
RE: MS on IOC - by trans - 05-20-2014, 04:21 AM
RE: MS on IOC - by petrengr1 - 05-20-2014, 05:34 AM
RE: MS on IOC - by Libtardius Maximus - 05-20-2014, 02:16 AM
RE: MS on IOC - by Getitrt2 - 05-20-2014, 05:24 AM
RE: MS on IOC - by jdeo1969 - 05-20-2014, 05:29 AM
RE: MS on IOC - by Palm - 05-20-2014, 05:41 AM
RE: MS on IOC - by sageo - 05-20-2014, 05:58 AM
RE: MS on IOC - by geologydude - 05-20-2014, 08:37 AM
RE: MS on IOC - by Getitrt2 - 05-20-2014, 08:37 AM
RE: MS on IOC - by Kaliboo - 05-20-2014, 01:26 PM
RE: MS on IOC - by admin - 05-20-2014, 05:48 AM
RE: MS on IOC - by johnwgrant - 05-20-2014, 06:07 AM
RE: MS on IOC - by Getitrt2 - 05-20-2014, 08:28 AM
RE: MS on IOC - by Tree - 05-20-2014, 10:22 AM
RE: MS on IOC - by jft310 - 05-20-2014, 02:10 PM
RE: MS on IOC - by johnwgrant - 05-20-2014, 10:37 PM
RE: MS on IOC - by Getitrt2 - 05-20-2014, 11:52 PM
RE: MS on IOC - by Tree - 05-21-2014, 12:28 AM
RE: MS on IOC - by Getitrt2 - 05-20-2014, 11:57 PM
RE: MS on IOC - by Palm - 05-21-2014, 12:41 AM
RE: MS on IOC - by Gator - 05-21-2014, 01:34 AM
RE: MS on IOC - by Libtardius Maximus - 05-21-2014, 03:03 AM
|
