'jft310' pid='46058' datel Wrote:My reference was to PETS work . His work was on an individual well basis. Others want to inject a new subject the probality is another subject not contained in my post. But I freely admit its a good point if the subject is changed to the probability of the wells success in total.
I graduated later near the top of my presigious MBA class. Hint I understand statisitcs but did not use them in my post. Had further training for 3 year post MBA. If some read my post to mean the statistical probability that was not the intent nor was it the language used. Nor was it in PETs work so referenced in my post.
This board needs to be more about Interoil and less about personal attack. The stock price frustration shows for some. Feel free to PM anytime about where I got the info I post about.
Whatever you excell at, it's not your reading abilities. Had you actually read my comments you would have noticed I was making two, and only these two arguments:
- One cannot add probabilities, you have to multiply them to arrive at three event probabilities
- Not everyone agrees with Pet's probabilities.
You would also have noticed that I actually make the calculations using pet's probabilities, so instead of repeatedly and triumphantically arguing I wasn't, you could (should!) have simply read my posts (and additional private clarifications), and clear up whether you were referring to all three wells or wells individually. In private you were clearly talking about the former, hence my confusion and my insistence on multiplying the probabilities.
Instead you chose a host of condescending, disparraging and even insulting comments, both in public and in private, for reasons only known to you, so I'm a little underwhelmed about you complaining about personal attacks here. You are at least as much a violator as a victim of that here.