07-09-2014, 04:37 AM
'admin' pid='46552' datel Wrote:["There are never really any proof that what CCTV 315's accustion against NQ is true. However it's CCTV, people in the China just believe in it and those 'rumors' spreads fast when hundred of million people believe in it."] This is exactly the kind of practise I'm referring at. ["Almost all cellphone software company at that time are collecting payment through SP (like YiDaTong) and there are lot of loophole for them to collect those money without real permission from end user. Chinese are not like paying money on the software, especially on security because they don't care lot at that time. That's main reason why so many chinese dislike NQ mobile today because Symbian used to be biggest user base of smart phone in China (before iphone) and most of NQ mobile users at that time are charged without actual permission from end user. Those loopholes are get fixed mostly since 2010 though."] From here I understand that this charging issue without consent (assuming that it happened, I still haven't seen any conclusive evidence) was common practise before 2010, not the exclusive reserve of NQ ("hoodlum" or otherwise)..
you are right. that's why I long NQ.
different people will have different take on it. But i've seen similar comments against Tencent and Qihoo before, kind of growing pain. As long as you have a strong business model in place bashers will disappear. The problem for NQ is that they must prove their business model, which is by releasing 20 F.