'Tusker' pid='47295' dateline='<a href="tel:1405652 Wrote:
'ebster123' pid='47286' dateline='<a href="tel:1405645 Wrote:This MB has so much benefit to so many. The issue many have is that some subgroups post opinions that contradict or question others, this is not inherently bad and in fact may be good. But wasn't this the basis of SHU, to post opinions and ideas that provide information for the investors of IOC. One does not need to drink the IOC KoolAid to be a member one just needs to hope to seek clarify. Too many we are on the same side are now in opposition for a stupid "post"or posts. It seems we need to all recalibrate and realize the possible payout is now 4 years from now not 4 years for when we started. The bigger problem is that in posting our distaste (myself included) we have alienated fellow supporters which in the end makes us weaker.
A Cognitive Psycologist and a Nuro-Linquistics empiricalists walk into a crowded bar. Both have a seat next to each other and begin a conversation. Bartender takes their orders and the evening commences. The two begin to point a each other, exhange puzzeled and vivid expressions, with gestures of scraped arms and shoulders. Their faces laugh and sigh, contort and relax. During this complete time, there is no vocal exchange. Finally the two get up, slap each other on the shoulder, toss bills on the bar for the tab and tip and leave.
A new bartender on his first night comments to the bartender who has served them before... what were those two fighting about?
The experience bartender replys... they were not fighting at all, they were listening.
Cheers
Tucker
Tucker, I agree, but I am not sure all do. The best core group is the one with balanced opinions.

