'Li'loilady' pid='58054' d Wrote:I believe the conductivity issue is spelled out in the SPA.
You are correct. It is in Annex 2 of the SPA of 3/26/14 (on page 71):
"Any petroleum encountered in future wells on the Antelope Field or its lateral components that is in Pressure Communication with petroleum in the Antelope-I, Antelope-2, Antelope-3 or Elk-4 wells
will also be considered part of the Antelope Field. Any petroleum encountered outside the Antelope Field but in Pressure Communication with wells that are part of the Antelope Field will also be
considered part ofthe Antelope Field.
Pressure Communication means with respect to any accumulation of petroleum, that:
(a) such an accumulation has petroleum bearing sediments which are in direct and continuous petroleum contact with the Elk Field or Antelope Field as necessary;
(b) such an accumulation belongs to the same petroleum pressure regime as the Elk Field or Antelope Field with which it is in such direct and continuous petroleum contact;
and
© the composition of the petroleum of such accumulation is consistent with the composition of the petroleum of the Elk Field or Antelope Field, as applicable, with
which it is in such direct and continuous petroleum contact. "
I leave it to others more knowlegable in pressure testing, like Pet or others, to explain exactly how the current testing regime will compute with these 'pressure communication' definitions in the SPA.