Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 2.67 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The energy and climate debate
#32

'ArtM72' pid='61494' datel Wrote:

'MartiniStocks9756' pid='61487' datel Wrote:Now take these computer models that once said on the cover of Newsweek in 1977 that the ice age is coming back. Add those computer models to the entire planet and I would civilly argue that computers cannot forecast the weather accurately three days in advance why should we think they can do climate for the planet. .

Perhaps one whose beliefs are based on fourty year old weather forecasts should consider an upgrade in their information resources.

So my question is when one sees the amazing progress in hydrocarbon industry computer signal processing over the past four decades how they might conclude similar efforts have not improved weather and climate forecasting?  Some regional forecasting I'm sure is more difficult than others, but as a close weather observer for four decades forecasts five to 10 days out continue to be more accurate with forecast variance continuing to tighten almost every year.  If you don't have a good idea what will likely be happening in 72 hours you should improve your weather resources.  I'd be happy to share some websites.

Share the websites with my local weather men.  They are more wrong than right 48 hrs out.

L Ron Rules!
Reply



Messages In This Thread
The energy and climate debate - by Stavros - 08-06-2015, 02:40 PM
RE: Anal-ists are Missing Key LNG Demand Issues - by TomCrooz - 08-11-2015, 04:09 AM
RE: The energy and climate debate - by Putncalls - 08-12-2015, 01:03 PM
RE: The energy and climate debate - by ArtM72 - 10-21-2015, 12:15 PM
RE: The energy and climate debate - by ArtM72 - 10-29-2015, 07:04 AM
RE: The energy and climate debate - by admin - 11-09-2016, 10:15 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)