The energy and climate debate

[ArtM72]

Why do the global warming believers keep citing IPCC? IPCC IS NOT A CREDIBLE SOURCE!!!!You could provide links to a billion pages but they are not credible sources!!!! These are the hockey stick code writers and the creators of the new it's probably the hottest hiatus year statistics. This is all political and the champions are known for Solyndra, Lerner, keeping your doctor, Benghazi, US U238 goes to Russia, the men did it, Bush did it, racism did it, trillions and trillions of debt, Keystone destroys the water, fracking is bad and Christians are eating gay people.

"The IPCC does not carry out its own original research, nor does it do the work of monitoring climate or related phenomena itself. The IPCC bases its assessment on the published literature, which includes peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed sources.^[7]

"Thousands of scientists and other experts contribute (on a voluntary basis, without payment from the IPCC)^[8] to writing and reviewing reports, which are then reviewed by governments. IPCC reports contain a "Summary for Policymakers", which is subject to line-by-line approval by delegates from all participating governments. Typically this involves the governments of more than 120 countries.^[9]"- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intergover...ate_Change

^{Without a doubt those scientists who  on a voluntary basis, without payment from the IPCC, contribute to the review of  published literature are all in it for the money.  As for the suggestion the IPCC is not a credible source, well that is about as weak an ad hominim attack as I've ever read.   If you search the world it is unlikely you we find one more authoritative.  As to your Benghazi reference it reminds me an awful lot of Rudi Juliani's use of "911" in every other sentence.}