09-19-2015, 01:32 AM
'Stavros' pid='62918' datel Wrote:
'Getitrt2' pid='62914' datel Wrote:That is 17.1 MILLION, i.e. 17.1 MMcfd, not mcfd, and it is a "flow constrained by tubing" which I do not think is comparable to the 705MMcfd. Maybe I am or was missing something, but I think the Ant 4 side track is significantly to the south, and that intersecting the reservoir (indicated before as all dolomite) 118 feet higher than the original well is extremely positive and further increases the resource, perhaps significantly. Their disclosure here indicates they think it is material. The main diagram on slide 6 showed the resource sloping down to the south, although in the insert I see indication of a yellow/higher section to the south, which I guess is what Sageo is referring to. I look forward to further information and Pet's comments. We may not add much from Ant 6, but we'll probably know and understand a lot more about the formation, and who knows? It appears to me we are adding a lot more to the resource from Ant 4 than anyone expected!
Antelope-1 383 million standard cubic feet per day; 6 inch choke; open to 3 1/2 inch
Antelope-2 705 million scfd; 6 inch choke; open to 4 3/8 inch
Triceratops-3 17.1 million scfd; choke size not given; open to 1 1/8 inch
You got it !!! Also,on 6-24-14 flow test on Ant#3 showed 46 million cfgd thru drill stem pipe ...could not find choke size. On Ant 2 ....4 3/8 opening is much greater than what we did at Tri #3 with the tubing. Tri looking better and better. Thanks Stavros and Getit .