'ArtM72' pid='65107' dateline='<a href="tel:1449372 Wrote:Hession didn't deliver Browse despite all his hoopla. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-08-18/he...ty/2845258. As development manager for Woodside's North African and North American resources he didn't appear to have moved much forward. Woodside's history doesn't suggest any Hession legacy there. http://www.woodside.com.au/About-Us/Prof...mOkX1WrQiI Should be an interesting AGM. Hession was given a great opportunity to succeed. Maybe an adjustment of his base is appropriate given his failure to deliver a single new field or meet any of his appraisal timelines. 2017 will be here before we know it. Have to go back and read Hession's early profession of transparency and under promising and over delivering.
Art, the interesting thing to me about IOC is that if it were just a study project or only analysis situation it would be very very intriguing. However, it is not only that, it is an investment for most of us. Some were likely smart enough to sit on the sideline and wait to pounce. I was not one of them, my fault I guess. However, since 2009/2010 IOC has been a sad sad "investment". MH came on like a night on a white horse. He was to under promise and over deliver. He seems to have done neither really at this point. Again, this is an investment and a sad one at that. For those who say, then sell and move on, good comeback. That is evading the point. We should have been getting the resource payment by now. While we wait and lose value continually MH and the rest of his crew get lofty salaries. Pathetic, MHO