'petrengr1' pid='66490' datel Wrote:
'sageo' pid='66488' datel Wrote:Pet - If I may go back to Ant 6 for a moment, based on the latest report from OSH,how far off am I on my guess for the thickness of the reservoir column ? From the numbers in that report,I believe we can expect about 450 feet (plus or minus a few meters ...limestone and/or dolomite) of reservoir between the top and the g/w contact.I know they mentioned lower quality of rock in this lagoonal strata, but at this stage, who knows for certain? If my thinking is flawed,any help would be appreciated.[ I can always blame "aging " brain cells ].
" border="0" class="smilie" src="http://shareholdersunite.com/mybb/images/smilies/biggrin.gif" />
Sageo- Good news! Nothing wrong with your aging brain cells. I get the same thing you do. Let's just hope for some good rock in that 450 foot interval above the gas/water contact.
Pet - Thanks for your approval concerning the old brain cells ! Next....,as the old sayin' goes, "if the good Lord is willin' and the creek don't rise" we will find lots of big holes in that 450 ft. of rock (which equalls good porosity) . ....which would produce some fine news for OSH or someone to relate to us. [As Palm often reminds us,"we wait".] With a little luck we could hear next week that we have reached TD . Best to you !

