Below you will find an excerpt from the OSH call which I think is of some interest-
Nik Burns, UBS - Analyst [47]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Okay, thanks for that. Just on Antelope you just repeated the interference test between Antelope 5 and 1, are you able to comment at all on whether those results validated the earlier results that were achieved there understanding that there was an issue with the gauge calibration the first time around? Are you able to comment on the results there at all?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ian Munro, Oil Search Limited - Executive General Manager [48]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It's a little too early. We recovered the gauges yesterday from Antelope 1 and Antelope 5 are now both out of the ground. We didn't have topol readouts so the data is now with the operators being calibrated and then we'll get a look at that I'd imagine in the next few days. It was a two week or so flow test and it was around a 10 day build up. We should get some very good data from 5 and the something that the engineers are quite excited to get in.
On Antelope 6 we've just taken our fourth core in the reservoir and we're doing an intermediate logging run. We'll test on the way down and then we'll drill out through the reservoir and do a longer term test and also an injectivity test as well.
I think once we've got all that data over the next sort of two, three, four weeks I think we're going to have a very good, a good feel for the resource base and all of that data is and will be provided to our certifiers.