Thread Rating:
  • 5 Vote(s) - 3.4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Hession Performance
#4
Here's the first line:

"Pulled IOC out of exclusive negotiations with Exxon for E/A which presumably would not have provided IOC with any interest in the potential LNG plant."

So at the very outset there is a presumed conclusion which never has ever been justified by anything more than pure speculation.

Another: How many of those on the positive list did Hession complete that which had been substantially done? Or, alternatively, the solution of a problem Hession's work product created?

Finally: Giving Hession credit for the size of Elk/Antelope is to divinify him. That's a bridge a little tooooo far.

Oh yeah. Just so I don't leave with a contribution to the "Not so good" list: Forgetting about Antelope South. Do you think we just have too damn much gas?
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Hession Performance - by 2126 - 04-07-2016, 02:08 AM
RE: Hession Performance - by Martinistocks - 04-07-2016, 02:29 AM
RE: Hession Performance - by jft310 - 04-07-2016, 02:51 AM
RE: Hession Performance - by ArtM72 - 04-07-2016, 05:35 AM
RE: Hession Performance - by kerekesc - 04-07-2016, 07:26 AM
RE: Hession Performance - by Palm - 04-07-2016, 12:41 PM
RE: Hession Performance - by will2bgreat - 04-07-2016, 08:57 PM
RE: Hession Performance - by jft310 - 04-07-2016, 10:01 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)