04-15-2016, 12:47 PM
Steve,
You are correct on a good number of your posts. I would add:
1. Company policy is that Execs are to own substantial shares in the company. To get there would normally require purchases in the open market, and a show of confidence to the markets are purchases which also shows proper leadership from the top.
2. To 2126- on the Insider Trading policy issue you raise, why were Armstrong (2- 45K share purchase on consecutive days) and Finlayson (8K shares) allowed to purchase shares in January, yet no one else did? If the "window" was open, why did so few take advantage? I've asked this before, but never received an answer/response.
You are correct on a good number of your posts. I would add:
1. Company policy is that Execs are to own substantial shares in the company. To get there would normally require purchases in the open market, and a show of confidence to the markets are purchases which also shows proper leadership from the top.
2. To 2126- on the Insider Trading policy issue you raise, why were Armstrong (2- 45K share purchase on consecutive days) and Finlayson (8K shares) allowed to purchase shares in January, yet no one else did? If the "window" was open, why did so few take advantage? I've asked this before, but never received an answer/response.