05-18-2016, 02:59 AM
'ArtM72' pid='69376' datel Wrote:-Having sat on a public corporation board before is now IOC's measure of competence? -That one has been a business associate of Mulacek with actual interest in Bobcat, Raptor and 3tops is reason enough for dismissal? -Modular and floating LNG are failed technologies? -That the present IOC board or management can take any credit for R, B or T discoveries, a continued appraisal program or any public plan for execution by other than Total? I could certainly continue, but the real message behind this ad hominem attack on Phil is "we hope Total doesn't delay further or this world class gravy train will come to an end." Palm, JFT, you guys think this IOC's evaluation of PM board nominees was a good one? Let's see how long MH and board lets the MS "update" stand without substantive correction.
I might add to your list that Hession has packed the BOD and executive management of IOC with Woodside/Woodside allied people, but the really pertinent point would be to compare the number of shares Mr. Mulacek owns with that of Hession and the rest of the current BOD. This would go a long way in explaining Mr. Mulacek's motivation.

