Interoil responds to Mulacek Board Nominations

[katytrader]

A very good response one must admit.

anyone voting with Phil has not read the above ,

have to say it - anyone voting against Phil hasn't looked at the share price and MH/Board compensation - almost a perfect negative correlation!

inconvenient reality which started long before the oil price fall.

And the incompetent pink shirt board can't even get the oil price right in the 2016 MIC (look at the ye 2014 and 2015 prices on page 57). One has to ask how many other errors or outright lies are in the MIC and indeed anything this Board says. The oil price was the only thing I fact checked. How can anyone trust people who are only out for themselves and report incorrect info (or lie) in support of that agenda? I truly wish I was making this up.

Yeah, Indo, perhaps a trip to Grand Rapids and a class or so at Calvin College might help you read data.  Data presented on Page 57 do not purport to be actual prices.  Had you absorbed the heading of the chart, you would have understood how the data had been adjusted to get the comparison.  But it's easy to call people incompetent and liars when most readers won't check the evidence you cite.

Suggest you look again - the graph is certainly a ratio (though not labeled as such), but the Table below it clearly has Brent Oil marked as in C$.    And if it was a ratio in the Table to the 2011 price, for YE 2015 the number would be 46 for Brent crude.

And I didn't say incompetent AND a liar, i said 'or' - oh well

I fly thru Detroit in a couple of weeks - is that near enough to Grand Rapids?

But as suggested by others, I'll pick up something at the airport bookstore to help me - maybe something to calm me down!

Cheers

Good grief !!  The data in the table are simply the points in the plot.   Are you really an engineer?   btw, I don't think this "performance graph" and associated data justify much, but they do deserve to be represented properly.