Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bottens comment
#25

'Putncalls' pid='71280' datel Wrote:

These "fields" exist because of subsidies. The subsidies exist because of misinformation. If it was a capital only decision they wouldn't exist. Politics is fickle.

These fields exist because of subsidies just like fracking exists because of Federal subsidies beginning in the Carter administration and continuing through Reagan, Bush etc. Not only research subsidies but subsidies given to provide supplemental support pricing for non conventional oil and gas.

Interestingly,

"Texas established a renewable portfolio standard (RPS) in 1999, amending it in 2005. The current RPS requires 5,880 MW of renewable energy by 2015. The state also has a target of reaching 10,000 MW of renewable capacity by 2025, a target that the wind energy industry met in 2010." Texas had 17,700 MW of capacity installed in 2015 with another 5,400 MW under construction.  http://awea.files.cms-plus.com/FileDownloads/pdfs/Texas.pdf

Does that change your opinion any?

Reply



Messages In This Thread
Bottens comment - by ioc.aussie - 06-01-2016, 12:47 PM
RE: Bottens comment - by ArtM72 - 06-01-2016, 12:56 PM
RE: Bottens comment - by Stavros - 06-01-2016, 01:07 PM
RE: Bottens comment - by oliver.gump - 06-01-2016, 01:18 PM
RE: Bottens comment - by UncleT - 06-01-2016, 01:53 PM
RE: Bottens comment - by admin - 06-01-2016, 02:03 PM
RE: Bottens comment - by ArtM72 - 06-02-2016, 02:26 AM
RE: Bottens comment - by Thylacine-2 - 06-02-2016, 03:25 AM
RE: Bottens comment - by ArtM72 - 06-02-2016, 04:03 AM
RE: Bottens comment - by admin - 06-01-2016, 01:41 PM
RE: Bottens comment - by ArtM72 - 06-02-2016, 02:09 AM
RE: Bottens comment - by Stavros - 06-01-2016, 02:07 PM
RE: Bottens comment - by Palm - 06-02-2016, 02:16 AM
RE: Bottens comment - by admin - 06-02-2016, 02:20 AM
RE: Bottens comment - by Thylacine-2 - 06-02-2016, 09:11 AM
RE: Bottens comment - by Palm - 06-02-2016, 02:33 AM
RE: Bottens comment - by AU74 - 06-02-2016, 02:48 AM
RE: Bottens comment - by Spartina - 06-02-2016, 02:47 AM
RE: Bottens comment - by Palm - 06-02-2016, 03:20 AM
RE: Bottens comment - by kerekesc - 06-02-2016, 07:57 AM
RE: Bottens comment - by Putncalls - 06-02-2016, 08:42 AM
RE: Bottens comment - by ArtM72 - 06-02-2016, 08:52 AM
RE: Bottens comment - by ArtM72 - 06-02-2016, 08:45 AM
RE: Bottens comment - by ArtM72 - 06-02-2016, 05:36 AM
RE: Bottens comment - by Palm - 06-02-2016, 08:37 AM
RE: Bottens comment - by kerekesc - 06-02-2016, 08:49 AM
RE: Bottens comment - by Palm - 06-02-2016, 08:56 AM
RE: Bottens comment - by Palm - 06-02-2016, 08:53 AM
RE: Bottens comment - by admin - 06-02-2016, 11:34 AM
RE: Bottens comment - by Putncalls - 06-02-2016, 09:27 AM
RE: Bottens comment - by ArtM72 - 06-02-2016, 09:55 AM
RE: Bottens comment - by katytrader - 06-02-2016, 10:17 AM
RE: Bottens comment - by Palm - 06-02-2016, 11:15 AM
RE: Bottens comment - by jft310 - 06-02-2016, 08:09 PM
RE: Bottens comment - by Palm - 06-02-2016, 09:05 PM
RE: Bottens comment - by jft310 - 06-02-2016, 09:23 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)