06-07-2016, 04:47 AM
Not at all. This language is a CYA statement given the volatile situation surrounding the deal. They are not/cannot dodge responsibility for acting prudently in serving in this role. And aa "breach" lawsuit can't be brought for something they haven't done yet. If they fulfill their duties (which they are doing by serving in this role for each party) and act as they should, no problems. However, they know they will invite trouble and lawsuits should they somehow taint the process.
The resource estimates will have to be made public, no way around that. Otherwise they know it's trouble. But to assume that just because this oversight would be in place spells doom or today would allow a breach lawsuit is a bit paranoid.
The resource estimates will have to be made public, no way around that. Otherwise they know it's trouble. But to assume that just because this oversight would be in place spells doom or today would allow a breach lawsuit is a bit paranoid.