(06-18-2016, 06:46 AM)Putncalls Wrote:
(06-18-2016, 06:44 AM)AU74 Wrote:
(06-18-2016, 06:43 AM)Putncalls Wrote: Thanks. OSH would rather risk paying more to Pac LNG rather than having the CGA numbers high lighted?
Exactly!
Shouldn't the concerned share holders make this a major issue?
I have no idea why they haven't. The whole mess stinks to high heaven.

