'Li'loilady' pid='76237' d Wrote:Thanks for your phenomenal work, 2126. I gather you heard back from the 3rd firm— the firm that Phil had retained. May I ask what exactly their response was?
I'm so glad your recuperation seems to be going well. Pace yourself, my friend.
–Li'l R.N.
Thanks, Li'l. Yes, the 3rd law firm declined, stating that they had had a meeting and had decided that there was a conflict of interest. My own interpretation of that is that Phil is NOT dissenting, but is rather using the clause in the Arrangment that allows him to negotiate with Exxon separately to sell his CRPs privately for whatever price he can negotiate with Exxon/IOC. He has laid out in his Concernedinteroilshareholders.com website his arguments that that price would be around $93/share. If he were voting NO/dissent, I don't believe there would have been a conflict to represent other dissenters.