01-26-2017, 04:14 AM
Exxon argued against Patadigm last time in court , how did that turn out ??
BMO is being paid for a favorable report , and BMO failed to include all the assets . The odds of BMO
making it through seem slim . Why Exxon didn't learn from the last court challenge falls into the amazing but true facts .
Worst case a dissenter gets the current deal when including all the assets . Best guess is a nice rise in value by dissenting . I trust Phil to get the most out of 3.5 million shares before giving up .
He found these assets and Hession and crew have proven they don't have a clue . He thinks Exxon is stealing the company as did the Appellate Court , I trust the courts to determine Net Asset Value .
Each most decide who is credible and why .
BMO is being paid for a favorable report , and BMO failed to include all the assets . The odds of BMO
making it through seem slim . Why Exxon didn't learn from the last court challenge falls into the amazing but true facts .
Worst case a dissenter gets the current deal when including all the assets . Best guess is a nice rise in value by dissenting . I trust Phil to get the most out of 3.5 million shares before giving up .
He found these assets and Hession and crew have proven they don't have a clue . He thinks Exxon is stealing the company as did the Appellate Court , I trust the courts to determine Net Asset Value .
Each most decide who is credible and why .