Thread Rating:
  • 5 Vote(s) - 3.4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Antelop 7 depth x time
#20

'oliver.gump' pid='79281' dateline='<a href="tel:1486135 Wrote:

'Li'loilady' pid='79272' dateline='<a href="tel:148 Wrote:

Is there an indication as to where this ST/bypass vertical well is positioned in relationship to the first hole poked?  Same well pad?  How close is it to the first well?  Thanks.

On the 25th the TVD was 1688, inclination: 6 degrees, and Azimuth: 183.55 degrees. So this indicates between 50-80m of horizontal travel over 500m of vertical travel, and all of it just to the west of due south. The Asimuth then varied between 180 and 132 degrees for the next 300m with an additional 30m of horizontal travel.

As of the 1st of feb, the side trace was almost exactly due south of the original well bore at about 100m horizontal separation.

If we look at the presentation that Phil and his people provided in (July?) last year, we can see that if the original well bore was on the wrong side of the fault, and the rubble zone caused them to lose the hole, then the new side-track is also on the western side of the fault, and will prove up results as Oil Search put it very well "Within expectations".

This well and its side track is a way for the consortium that is ripping us off, to have the appearance of doing the right thing, to please the regulators, and courts, whilst not endangering IOC/XOM/OSH ability to push the estimate down and ensure a lower payout to the shareholders.

I have attached a cutting from Phil's presentation, and I have marked the location of the sidetrack with a blue dot.

Nice post.  Thanks for sharing.  Sad but probably true.

Reply



Messages In This Thread
Antelop 7 depth x time - by Syb3rm0nkey - 01-20-2017, 08:21 AM
RE: Antelop 7 depth x time - by hirosan - 01-21-2017, 07:18 AM
RE: Antelop 7 depth x time - by jft310 - 01-21-2017, 12:16 PM
RE: Antelop 7 depth x time - by ebster123 - 01-21-2017, 12:20 PM
RE: Antelop 7 depth x time - by Northoil - 01-22-2017, 02:17 AM
RE: Antelop 7 depth x time - by sageo - 01-22-2017, 05:46 AM
RE: Antelop 7 depth x time - by jft310 - 01-21-2017, 12:25 PM
RE: Antelop 7 depth x time - by Kaliboo - 01-22-2017, 05:51 AM
RE: Antelop 7 depth x time - by Kaliboo - 02-02-2017, 11:24 AM
RE: Antelop 7 depth x time - by Northoil - 02-03-2017, 02:24 AM
RE: Antelop 7 depth x time - by Kaliboo - 02-03-2017, 04:24 AM
RE: Antelop 7 depth x time - by Northoil - 02-03-2017, 06:14 AM
RE: Antelop 7 depth x time - by Stavros - 01-22-2017, 12:41 PM
RE: Antelop 7 depth x time - by sageo - 02-03-2017, 04:55 AM
RE: Antelop 7 depth x time - by Li'loilady - 02-03-2017, 10:50 AM
RE: Antelop 7 depth x time - by sageo - 02-04-2017, 03:49 AM
RE: Antelop 7 depth x time - by Li'loilady - 02-03-2017, 11:03 AM
RE: Antelop 7 depth x time - by bdahl385 - 02-03-2017, 01:39 PM
RE: Antelop 7 depth x time - by oliver.gump - 02-04-2017, 01:28 AM
RE: Antelop 7 depth x time - by Kaliboo - 02-04-2017, 01:47 AM
RE: Antelop 7 depth x time - by sageo - 02-04-2017, 01:54 AM
RE: Antelop 7 depth x time - by bdahl385 - 02-04-2017, 02:13 AM
RE: Antelop 7 depth x time - by oliver.gump - 02-04-2017, 03:19 AM
RE: Antelop 7 depth x time - by Li'loilady - 02-04-2017, 04:00 PM
RE: Antelop 7 depth x time - by sageo - 02-09-2017, 04:12 AM
RE: Antelop 7 depth x time - by oliver.gump - 02-09-2017, 05:37 AM
RE: Antelop 7 depth x time - by Kaliboo - 02-09-2017, 06:01 AM
RE: Antelop 7 depth x time - by Li'loilady - 02-03-2017, 07:54 PM
RE: Antelop 7 depth x time - by jft310 - 02-04-2017, 10:41 PM
RE: Antelop 7 depth x time - by Stavros - 02-09-2017, 03:12 PM
RE: Antelop 7 depth x time - by oliver.gump - 02-09-2017, 03:23 PM
RE: Antelop 7 depth x time - by Northoil - 02-10-2017, 12:05 AM
RE: Antelop 7 depth x time - by Kaliboo - 02-10-2017, 03:23 AM
RE: Antelop 7 depth x time - by bdahl385 - 02-10-2017, 11:38 AM
RE: Antelop 7 depth x time - by Li'loilady - 02-11-2017, 08:10 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)