|
Q for MB
|
08-16-2012, 01:46 AM
Since IOC is all about the partnering, it should have been the first Q asked and it wasn't. Why is that? because they know that IOC will not answer that question. [/quote]
Shell execs asked for the Q in their CC. Got the Q and answered the Q. Phil was quoted the day before as acknowledging they were in talks with Shell. It is the first Q anyone should have asked, why wasn't it? |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
RE: Q for MB - by Libtardius Maximus - 08-16-2012, 01:37 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Tree - 08-16-2012, 01:39 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Putncalls - 08-16-2012, 01:42 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Tree - 08-16-2012, 01:46 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Putncalls - 08-16-2012, 01:55 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Tree - 08-16-2012, 02:06 AM
RE: Q for MB - by ValueSleuth - 08-16-2012, 02:20 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Palm - 08-16-2012, 02:33 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Tree - 08-16-2012, 02:42 AM
RE: Q for MB - by jft310 - 08-16-2012, 03:13 AM
RE: Q for MB - by ValueSleuth - 08-16-2012, 03:49 AM
RE: Q for MB - by trans - 08-16-2012, 03:57 AM
RE: Q for MB - by jft310 - 08-16-2012, 04:01 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Putncalls - 08-16-2012, 04:09 AM
RE: Q for MB - by jft310 - 08-16-2012, 04:26 AM
RE: Q for MB - by jft310 - 08-16-2012, 04:27 AM
RE: Q for MB - by petrengr1 - 08-16-2012, 04:51 AM
RE: Q for MB - by jft310 - 08-16-2012, 04:53 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Palm - 08-16-2012, 04:59 AM
RE: Q for MB - by jft310 - 08-16-2012, 06:43 AM
RE: Q for MB - by oilmd9 - 08-16-2012, 02:40 PM
RE: Q for MB - by ValueSleuth - 08-16-2012, 05:54 PM
|
