|
Q for MB
|
08-16-2012, 02:06 AM
"because IOC should not answer the question? What is your point? [/quote] Puts, IOC get's Qs every CC they respond to with 'can't answer that due to CA's'. Shell Q should have been asked with that CA answer expected. You must think they should not have been asked about Shell talks, you know, the folks behind Project Zebra, Duma's prime choice and validated by Phil as in talks with them? The Q was not asked as it was not wanted as aked is the only answer. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
RE: Q for MB - by Libtardius Maximus - 08-16-2012, 01:37 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Tree - 08-16-2012, 01:39 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Putncalls - 08-16-2012, 01:42 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Tree - 08-16-2012, 01:46 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Putncalls - 08-16-2012, 01:55 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Tree - 08-16-2012, 02:06 AM
RE: Q for MB - by ValueSleuth - 08-16-2012, 02:20 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Palm - 08-16-2012, 02:33 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Tree - 08-16-2012, 02:42 AM
RE: Q for MB - by jft310 - 08-16-2012, 03:13 AM
RE: Q for MB - by ValueSleuth - 08-16-2012, 03:49 AM
RE: Q for MB - by trans - 08-16-2012, 03:57 AM
RE: Q for MB - by jft310 - 08-16-2012, 04:01 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Putncalls - 08-16-2012, 04:09 AM
RE: Q for MB - by jft310 - 08-16-2012, 04:26 AM
RE: Q for MB - by jft310 - 08-16-2012, 04:27 AM
RE: Q for MB - by petrengr1 - 08-16-2012, 04:51 AM
RE: Q for MB - by jft310 - 08-16-2012, 04:53 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Palm - 08-16-2012, 04:59 AM
RE: Q for MB - by jft310 - 08-16-2012, 06:43 AM
RE: Q for MB - by oilmd9 - 08-16-2012, 02:40 PM
RE: Q for MB - by ValueSleuth - 08-16-2012, 05:54 PM
|
