ShareholdersUnite Forums › Companies › InterOil Forum v
Q for MB

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Q for MB
jft310 Offline
What I Hear.......
*****
Posts: 8,568
Threads: 1,342
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation: 380
#21
08-16-2012, 06:43 AM
Many sources of possible news. besides the deals I like what Phil said about early cash flows. They would work with PRE for a plan for early cash flows of the condensates.
This early cash flow would drive IOC PPS up and help keep it up as we wait for the 36-42 month LNG plant build.
Appears we may get another drilling partner at 236. Imagine PRE drilling , IOC drilling and the new partner all drilling at the same time. Now that got news possibilites we can agree. What if they are all working on reefs.
Website Find
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Q for MB - by Tree - 08-16-2012, 01:35 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Libtardius Maximus - 08-16-2012, 01:37 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Tree - 08-16-2012, 01:39 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Putncalls - 08-16-2012, 01:42 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Tree - 08-16-2012, 01:46 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Putncalls - 08-16-2012, 01:55 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Tree - 08-16-2012, 02:06 AM
RE: Q for MB - by ValueSleuth - 08-16-2012, 02:20 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Palm - 08-16-2012, 02:33 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Tree - 08-16-2012, 02:42 AM
RE: Q for MB - by jft310 - 08-16-2012, 03:13 AM
RE: Q for MB - by ValueSleuth - 08-16-2012, 03:49 AM
RE: Q for MB - by trans - 08-16-2012, 03:57 AM
RE: Q for MB - by jft310 - 08-16-2012, 04:01 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Putncalls - 08-16-2012, 04:09 AM
RE: Q for MB - by jft310 - 08-16-2012, 04:26 AM
RE: Q for MB - by jft310 - 08-16-2012, 04:27 AM
RE: Q for MB - by petrengr1 - 08-16-2012, 04:51 AM
RE: Q for MB - by jft310 - 08-16-2012, 04:53 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Palm - 08-16-2012, 04:59 AM
RE: Q for MB - by jft310 - 08-16-2012, 06:43 AM
RE: Q for MB - by oilmd9 - 08-16-2012, 02:40 PM
RE: Q for MB - by ValueSleuth - 08-16-2012, 05:54 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)