Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Q for MB
#22
Was in Denver visiting son and dropped in on Enercom conference and breakout. JFT has summarized main presentation well. Sounds like more meetings scheduled with gov't ?tomm. Described T-2 as probably our 3rd best well after the Antelope wells. Flow rates at T-2 when on production could be much higher than on the DSTs. No fundamental reason for recent stockprice swing. Very positive on new gov"t. After new Elk-Antelope wells, to go to Mako and Tuna. Need to spud these by March or April I believe to meet retention requirements. These areas are much more flat and should help speed process along. Only about 15 people at breakout. Think late afternoon time for presentation affected attendence. Nice to see Gander!
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Q for MB - by Tree - 08-16-2012, 01:35 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Libtardius Maximus - 08-16-2012, 01:37 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Tree - 08-16-2012, 01:39 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Putncalls - 08-16-2012, 01:42 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Tree - 08-16-2012, 01:46 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Putncalls - 08-16-2012, 01:55 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Tree - 08-16-2012, 02:06 AM
RE: Q for MB - by ValueSleuth - 08-16-2012, 02:20 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Palm - 08-16-2012, 02:33 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Tree - 08-16-2012, 02:42 AM
RE: Q for MB - by jft310 - 08-16-2012, 03:13 AM
RE: Q for MB - by ValueSleuth - 08-16-2012, 03:49 AM
RE: Q for MB - by trans - 08-16-2012, 03:57 AM
RE: Q for MB - by jft310 - 08-16-2012, 04:01 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Putncalls - 08-16-2012, 04:09 AM
RE: Q for MB - by jft310 - 08-16-2012, 04:26 AM
RE: Q for MB - by jft310 - 08-16-2012, 04:27 AM
RE: Q for MB - by petrengr1 - 08-16-2012, 04:51 AM
RE: Q for MB - by jft310 - 08-16-2012, 04:53 AM
RE: Q for MB - by Palm - 08-16-2012, 04:59 AM
RE: Q for MB - by jft310 - 08-16-2012, 06:43 AM
RE: Q for MB - by oilmd9 - 08-16-2012, 02:40 PM
RE: Q for MB - by ValueSleuth - 08-16-2012, 05:54 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)