'efi426hemi' pid='8363' datel Wrote:
'ValueSleuth' pid='8345' datel Wrote:This was posted on Yahoo recently.
If true, pandora's box has been opened, including consideration of EWC/FLEX LNG program.
VS
Hey VS,
I believe a friend of mine, who attended the AGM, recently asked a member of the executive if it was possible for EWC/FLEX to be back in the picture with the improved situation with the government. The answer was no, they are too far down the path with the selldown. I won't discount some form of modular/floater at Triceratops, but unlikely if they build a traditional plant on the coast as it would be much easier to tie into that existing infrastructure.
What is your rationale/source for thinking EWC/FLEX is possibly being reconsidered?
Health and Happiness,hemi
With respect to EWC/FLEX I was thinking of Triceratops. If I were IOC, I'd be attempting to get some kind of a commitment from the government to consider EWC/FLEX in the future, and get as much of a commitment as they can now.
The rationale is, as it always has been, that EWC/FLEX is economically compelling for all parties.
Given the costs associated with stick-built plants, even the reduced marginal cost per LNG ton of additions to stick-built plants, I suspect that the EWC/FLEX arrangements are still cheaper.
The question is whether PNG is willing to concede anything to InterOil at this point.
VS
